Showing posts with label etymology. Show all posts
Showing posts with label etymology. Show all posts

Monday, December 27, 2010

Why Do Dogs/Cats Have Wet Noses??

Since a dog's nose doesn't have sweat pores, it's moisturized, aside from licking, by capillary action in the rivulets of the nose.


If you've ever watched a good cops and robbers chase movie, or played tag as a kid you might understand how that the best place to hide is often in plain sight - make it so obvious that no one would look there.  That's also what makes for a great twist at the end of a movie - it's right in front of you and you'd never guess it - brilliant.

Stick Man is 'under'-'standing'
I even love this in words.  It's great to learn something about a root word and be in awe that you never thought about that before.  I'll give an example from the above paragraph (completely unplanned)--understand.  Our language is loaded with words like this that you probably never, ever think about how it's the combination of 'under' and 'stand' - when you understand you are analogically standing beneath the idea.  Brilliant.  So obvious.

It's the same with this question.  I'm captivated because it's so obvious.  Why have I never thought about or questioned why dogs and cats (and plenty of other mammals) have wet noses (rhinariums)!!!



Let's look at some possibilities and consider how they could be falsified (I've been convicted that I need to add falsification tests to more of my blogs). (Let me say that I'm biased and clearly have one favorite answer)

  • Thermoregulation - the nut shell: "Dogs and cats have wet noses like we sweat - to cool off."
    • Compare cold and warm weather wet noses.  They should be bigger in hot weather climates and smaller farther north/higher in elevation.
    • Measure heat coming off nose.  It should be significant if that's the purpose of the rhinarium.
    • Consider blood flow levels and the shape of the organ in comparison to other 'known' thermoregulation organs.  Consider the ears of a jack rabbit or elephant or the spinal ridge of a dimetrodon.  Each of these organs got big, thin and heavily vasculated to radiate heat out.  Those examples are quite different from a wet nose.
African elephants have bigger ears because they have a greater need to deal with excess heat.

    • Lick Hypothesis - *Winner of the Tautology Award.  Talk about cart before horse.  The websites that I saw this at (which were many) have not thought through this.  Giraffe necks are long because they grew alot.  Duh.

    • Smell Catcher
      • Identity/count olfactory receptors or channels to receptors in comparison to known receptor zones.
      • Consider why being able to passively smell (as opposed to actively breathing in the scent) might be an advantage - high wind environments, low breathing rates...
      • Interesting article on the rhinarium's smell sorting function.

    • Weathervane - related question: why do many animals have two nostrils, but they're on the same side of the head??  One might assume we have two nostrils in order to sense the direction a smell is coming from.  This is why you have ears on each side of your head.  Your brain does split second calculations comparing which ear heard first and loudest.  Have you ever had the experience where you hear something unexpected directly behind you and it sounded like it was in front of you?  It's rare, but I have.  Like abnormal psychology has much to teach us about normal brain function, so can a slight malfunction of our normal sound directionality perception teach us how important and powerful having ears on each side of our head to determine the location of the sound. 
      • Count/identify temperature and touch nerves in comparison to other parts of the skin.
      • Is the wet nose omnidirectional?  If it's not then it wouldn't be a very effective weathervane.  It needs to be able to sense zephyrs of wind from many vantage points and contrast the evaporative coolness on different sides.
      • Anesthetize one and later both sides of the outside of the nose.  See if directionality of smelling is inhibited or if animal is misled to the wrong direction.  As in, if the right side is anesthetized that the animal goes to its left to find smell source since all wind will seem to come from the left.
      • Anesthetize the olfactory cells in one side of nose.  See if directionality of smelling is inhibited.
      • Create windless environment and see if directionality of smelling is inhibited.
      • Do animals that breath through one nostril at a time (like humans, supposedly we alternate nostrils every 6 hours) need directional smelling less or have other adaptations to deal with the problem?  Is this alternating form of breathing widespread?
      • Are animals that have dry noses more likely to have nostrils that face opposite directions to make up for a directionality sensing deficit? 
    A theoretical sketch of the possible advantages and disadvantages of having nostrils on opposite sides of an organisms head versus a nose with a built in weathervane.
    *Related bonus question: why do many species with rhinariums have a slit running on the outside of the nose (see bear picture above)?  I've  heard that many species have a flap within their nasal passage that directs out going air out the sides and inward throw the middle to flow over the smell receptors.  This helps avoid the problem of double smelling or smelling something coming out of your lungs.  Fascinating!
        Wet noses are so largely universal in mammals that the above exception is so notable that it's become a part of its name: hairy-nosed wombat.  Certain primates are another another exception: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplorrhine


        Images are from:  here, here, here, here, here, here, and here 

          Sunday, May 2, 2010

          Religion's Etymology--'To Bind'

          Ever since I took Greek classes in seminary I have been fully aware of how awesome learning the roots of words can be.  Many on the outside don't realize the grueling, laborious, fastidious dedication that many Biblical translators have, nor do they realize that scores of people have made livelihoods off of being the experts needed to translate the various morphemes of the Bible they see in their local bookstore.  Each word of the New Testament has been historically tracked, traced and gone over with a fine tooth comb to see the various contexts it has been used in both in the scriptures as well as other ancient manuscripts.  I personally own a set of software valued at somewhere around or over 1000 dollars that contains copious grammars and dictionarys cross-referencing every location each word is used in the Bible and potentially every time it was used in the surviving manuscripts of that day (I can't bring myself to sell it even though I've sold copious amounts of my other theology book).  It's really quite fascinating (and not a little bit overwhelming).  You couldn't learn all there is to know in several life times.  

          Why did I just say all that?  Legitimate question.  To break the ice of discussing a very interesting root word.

          Religion.

          Origin: 
          1150–1200; ME religioun (< OF religion) < L religiōn- (s. of religiō) conscientiousness, piety, equiv. to relig(āre) to tie, fasten (re- re- +ligāre to bind, tie; cf. ligament) + -iōn- -ioncf. rely

          religion



          c.1200, "state of life bound by monastic vows," also "conduct indicating a belief in a divine power," from Anglo-Fr. religiun (11c.), from O.Fr. religion "religious community," from L. religionem (nom.religio) "respect for what is sacred, reverence for the gods," in L.L. "monastic life" (5c.); according to Cicero, derived from relegare "go through again, read again," from re- "again" + legere "read" (seelecture). However, popular etymology among the later ancients (and many modern writers) connects it with religare "to bind fast" (see rely), via notion of "place an obligation on," or "bond between humans and gods." Another possible origin is religiens "careful," opposite of negligens. Meaning "particular system of faith" is recorded from c.1300.  Modern sense of "recognition of, obedience to, and worship of a higher, unseen power" is from 1530s. Religious is first recorded early 13c. Transferred sense of "scrupulous, exact" is recorded from 1590s.
          (copied from dictionary.com)

          Religion, quite possibly, comes from a root word meaning 'to bind' (and interestingly enough, so does 'rely'!  How cools that?!)  

          What irony!  



          Religion 'binds' us together, heals us

          Isn't it fascinating the way that can be taken more than one way!!!?  On one hand, you could say that religion is the thing that 'binds' society together.  It's the social glue that keeps us from coming undone into shear chaos and rules of the jungle anarchy.  It keeps us sane.  It's like the cast, sling or wrap that keeps an injury from becoming worse.  It very well may come from the same word that 'ligament' comes from--the means that keeps our bones and joints in place and working properly.  

          Religion 'binds' us, trapping us

          If there has ever been a flagrantly anti-intellectual movement it is religion.  What other system of thought has systematically denied and suppressed information and whole fields of study, e.g. evolution, embryonic stem cell research, heliocentrism, etc.  I don't need to list out the historical wars that it has perennially caused.  A paraphrase of something Stephen Weinberg said--good people do good things and bad people bad things, but it takes religion to make a good person do bad things.  Religion silences the questions, inventions, innovations, explorations and intrepid scientific spirit that has made our species so great and instead substitutes a pale, weak, impotent myth for the glorious reality of possibilities.  "Don't ask questions, just believe, just do as we say."

          In the end, both are true.  
          But what makes the difference?  
          Why is it sometimes salubrious and others pernicious?